PromptShip
Comparison

PromptShip vs Fly.io

PromptShip and Fly are in the same category, managed container hosting that runs your standard Docker image. Fly leans into multi-region and Machines-level control. PromptShip centers per-agent identity, production write approvals, one action ledger, and the app plus its databases as one environment.

Feature comparison

PromptShipFly.io
Standard Docker images✓✓
Persistent containers, no cold starts✓✓
Multi-region deploys✕✓
Managed Postgres attachedApp environment, one callFly Managed Postgres (separate product/plans)
Managed Redis-compatible cache✓Upstash add-on
ClickHouse analytics✓✕
Agent identity and environment scopePer-agent, environment-scoped tokenYour Fly account credentials
Agent production writes and attributionHuman approval + one action ledgerNo approval hold or unified agent attribution
Frontend-specific deployment pipeline✓Any container; no frontend-specific pipeline
Predictable tier pricing✓✕

When Fly is the right choice

  • • You need real multi-region deployment with anycast routing.
  • • You want Machines-level control over placement, sizing, and process topology.
  • • You want to deploy through flyctl or Fly's MCP server using your own Fly account.

When PromptShip is the right choice

  • • You want per-agent, environment-scoped tokens, human approval on agent-initiated production writes, and one action ledger.
  • • You want managed Postgres, Redis, and ClickHouse attached without separate provisioning.
  • • You want a frontend-specific pipeline alongside persistent backend services.
Get started

Try PromptShip instead of Fly

Governed agent operations and app plus databases as one environment. Free during early access.

[ Join the waitlist ]

Already have access? Install the MCP

$ claude mcp add --transport http promptship https://mcp.promptship.dev/mcp